User talk:Dysprosia

This user may have left Wikipedia. Dysprosia has not edited Wikipedia since March 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archived talk: kind messages, 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 -- 6 -- 7 -- 8 -- 9 -- 10 -- 11 -- 12 -- 13 -- 14 -- 15 -- 16 -- 17 -- 18 -- 19 -- 20 -- 21 -- 22 -- 23 -- 24 -- 25 -- 26

CountryLink images

Would it be possible to edit your pictures with some promotional picture in order to give people a better feel of the service that you received. Ken CounntryLink Web mgr --User:CountryLink 15:03, 21 August 2007 (cst)

{subst:dysprosia|Image:XPT sleeper interior.jpg}}

chip code

Please see my comments at talk:Code division multiple access#chip code?. Dicklyon 16:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 22:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

RE: Added sections

In response to your comments on the NASA Budget discussion page that you posted in July 2006, please review the Wikipage once again and feel free to provide any comments or further suggestions for improvement. Regards, ~JS~ WSpaceport 17:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Crail logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Crail logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Leon Sumbitches aka Brian Wheat

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Leon Sumbitches aka Brian Wheat, by Golfhaus, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Leon Sumbitches aka Brian Wheat is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Leon Sumbitches aka Brian Wheat, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Leon Sumbitches aka Brian Wheat itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Desktop.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:OPENSTEP Desktop.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CMYK color model

Back in '04 you said you did some research in adding some conversion equations to this article. But you didn't note your source. You think you can find it? I'm consider just throwing out the conversion equations, but if there's a source then they can probably stay. Dicklyon 02:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OPENSTEP_Mail_application.jpg

I have tagged Image:OPENSTEP_Mail_application.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 19:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OPENSTEP Workspace Manager.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:OPENSTEP Workspace Manager.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Category System

I am a graduate student in scientific computing at stanford (icme.stanford.edu). You username came up on some of the early category pages. We are trying to understand a little bit about the history of categories so that we can accurately discuss them in a research paper. If you would be willing to help us out that would be fantastic. I can be reached at my wikipedia name @stanford.edu. Thanks for your time. Jkozdon 00:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Sophie_Panopoulos.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Sophie_Panopoulos.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 21:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OPENSTEP_Grab_icon.jpg

I have tagged Image:OPENSTEP_Grab_icon.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 22:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of MathWorld

A tag has been placed on MathWorld, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 08:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of MathWorld

MathWorld, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that MathWorld satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MathWorld and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of MathWorld during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 06:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question about an image you contributed

According to the records, you contributed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Radiofax_image_5100_WMC.png . Did you receive this with your own shortwave equipment? If so, where was the receiver located? Just curious, and thanks! Alan.sheets 21:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone scale

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tone scale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tone scale. Cirt (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tone scale

I have nominated Tone scale, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tone scale. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cirt (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Chess.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OPENSTEP Chess.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Digital Webster.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OPENSTEP Digital Webster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Dock.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OPENSTEP Dock.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Shelf.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OPENSTEP Shelf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OPENSTEP Terminal.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OPENSTEP Terminal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I've seen your important contributions for the article Recurrence relation. I'm looking for the general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression for the exact trigonometric constants of the form: ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ , when n is natural (and is not given in advance). Do you know of any such general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression? (note that any exponential-expression-over-the-imaginaries is also excluded since it's trivially equivalent to a real-trigonometric expression).

Let me explain: if we choose n=1 then the term ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ becomes "0", which is a simple (non-trigonometric) constant. If we choose n=2 then the term ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ becomes ${\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}\end{aligned}}$ , which is again a non-trigonometric expression. etc. etc. Generally, for every natural n, the term ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ becomes a non-trigonometric expression. However, when n is not given in advance, then the very expression ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ per se - is a trigonometric expression. I'm looking for the general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression equivalent to ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ , when n is not given in advance. If not for the cosine - then for the sine or the tangent or the cotangent.

Eliko (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Gericault Insane.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Gericault Insane.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Gericault Insane.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 03:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me to fix my not-so-great looking image at commons:Image:AMS Euler sample.png?

Hey there,

You made a wonderful example of the AMS Euler TeX font over at commons:Image:AMS Euler sample.png, which I really liked. After a look at it, I realized that there was a mathematical error, so I fixed it, but as I don't have your understanding of how to create a png image from a LaTeX file I wound up with a not-so-great looking version. Would you be willing to tell me how you created the png image so that I can improve it? I've searched around on google, tried convert, but I just can't get it to work. Thanks so much, Kyle Barbour 01:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! I figured out a (kludgey) way of getting this done, so we're all set. Thanks! Kyle Barbour 11:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Winding number example.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Winding number example.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Starckdeutsch

An article that you have been involved in editing, Starckdeutsch, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starckdeutsch (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 21:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Ray's Urine

Image:Lips_plain.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lips_plain.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 19:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tierce.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tierce.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Unibar (Woollongong)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Unibar (Woollongong), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Unibar (Woollongong) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Unibar (Woollongong), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Emaj scale 4.ogg

File:Emaj scale 4.ogg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Emaj scale 4.ogg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Emaj scale 4.ogg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hook turn 1.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hook turn 1.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hook turn 2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hook turn 2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human stack.png is now available as Commons:File:Human stack.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keyhole contour.png is now available as Commons:File:Keyhole contour.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martello tower at La Preneuse.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Martello tower at La Preneuse.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dysprosia! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 36 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

György Kurtág - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Donald Cole (anthropologist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jacques Loussier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Hall (video artist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Donald Cole (anthropologist)

I have nominated Donald Cole (anthropologist), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Cole (anthropologist). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MBisanz ^talk 22:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:LGBT

Category:LGBT, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Intentionally blank page for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intentionally blank page is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intentionally blank page until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bdb484 (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:OPENSTEP Workspace Manager.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:OPENSTEP Workspace Manager.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template

Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Radiofax image 5100 WMC.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Radiofax image 5100 WMC.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template

Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eidolon Software

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eidolon Software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imaginary friend for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imaginary friend is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imaginary friend (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template

Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. A8v (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bel (Acustics)

Hello Dysprosia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bel (Acustics) for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Deepanshu M. (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douchebag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douchebag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douchebag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SSTflyer 09:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WEEKLY SHONEN JUMP listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WEEKLY SHONEN JUMP. Since you had some involvement with the WEEKLY SHONEN JUMP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Primitive element

A tag has been placed on Primitive element requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jasonanaggie (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Orbit Media for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orbit Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbit Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 07:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)

Seinfeld trivia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Seinfeld trivia. Since you had some involvement with the Seinfeld trivia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Athleta Inc

Dysprosia,, would you like to help me on a page about Athleta inc? Its a gap branch — Preceding unsigned comment added by FerociousPickle (talk • contribs) 18:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emotional tone scale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emotional tone scale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional tone scale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hobit (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Synthaudio

Template:Synthaudio has been nominated for merging with Template:Listen. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ~~Ebe 123~~ → report 12:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tabby Cat (solitaire)

The article Tabby Cat (solitaire) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this game is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"YouInsensitiveClod" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect YouInsensitiveClod. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 23#YouInsensitiveClod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Method of successive substitution

The article Method of successive substitution has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTTEXTBOOK-violating material that has remained unsourced and essentially unlinked from anywhere else in the encyclopedia for more than 20 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBL (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]