Jump to content

User talk:MattRevell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your Entry on Wikipedia

[edit]

You blanked the following text from DGG And I quote "I--and everyone--will agree with Politicalwatchmen that there simply must be third party sources. This is especially and invariably necessary if it seems that it might be your autobio. There is a presumption of COI, and there are obvious very good reasons why WP looks at things that way. I'll be glad to remove the tag if you can get the refs in. If not, there isnt a chance it could or should be kept. Thus, it would not be advisable to remove it yourself. If they cant be found, you can yourself honorably request to have the article deleted."

I have re-applied the PROD for the reasons DGG states, if the article is deleted then I have copied the information to your user page, if you do not want it on your user page then it shouldn't be in an article. Politicalwatchmen 19:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bazaar-logo-125x125.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bazaar-logo-125x125.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello MattRevell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Ray Wilson (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kelman's source characteristics for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelman's source characteristics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelman's source characteristics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kelman's

[edit]

You should add some citations and expand on the method. I think if you can show and build up article, it can survive. O.maximov (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]